Home

Current Laws

Religious voices

But the Atheist said...

Comedians

Feedback

External links

An ever so brief introduction

The debates concerning Jerry Springer the Opera, and the recent Islamic Cartoons, have pushed the uneasy relationship between religion and satire into the public eye once again. However, religious satire is by no means a modern phenomenon. Early examples can be seen with Persius Flaccus (34-62 CE), within his book of uncompromising social poetry. Reflecting on the prayers of noble men in the temple, Flaccus wrote, “a sound mind, a good name, integrity- for these he prays aloud, and so that his neighbour may hear. But in his inmost breath, and beneath his breath he murmurs thus, Oh that my uncle would evaporate, what a splendid funeral!”. (The satires of Juvenal, Persius, Sulipcia and Lucias). While individual fallability has always been a popular focus for humour, the role of oppressive religious groups within society led to an increased prevalence in institutional satire. Chaucer, for example had a particular penchant for belittling monks and their aids. Recent trends have edged towards theological satire, and reflect unsurpassed freedoms of speech. But is this new situation healthy? Should such opposing forces be allowed in such close quarters? Does the offence caused by Monty Pythons Life of Brian suggest more caution is required? Is legislation such as religious hatred laws necessary?

But why this website now?

In August the Edinburgh Fringe Festival begins. Controversy has very much reared its head again as this year's festival prepares to welcome the show Cash in Christ. The show was written by Australian comics Van Badham and Johnny Berliner, and had to be passed by three lawyers before it could be performed on their native soil. Comprising sermons from Christian literature, television programmes and church services, a backlash seems imminent. The past reactions from "religious fundamentalists" might suggest that all religious followers are up in arms about satire. So do all observants take this line? Should comics and satirists be limited in what they can say? Is legal repercussion necessary to control what is acceptable?

In this website we'll hear from representatives from the key denominations, from a legal representative, in an effort to see what comics should avoid, and the performers who will be treading this ever so thin line in Edinburgh throughout August.